Softball anyone? White House Press Corps...

This is Dave Young's Forum.
Can you really bridge the gap between reality and training? Between traditional karate and real world encounters? Absolutely, we will address in this forum why this transition is necessary and critical for survival, and provide suggestions on how to do this correctly. So come in and feel welcomed, but leave your egos at the door!
User avatar
Panther
Posts: 2807
Joined: Wed May 17, 2000 6:01 am
Location: Massachusetts

Post by Panther »

Dana,

Many of the hollywood set have said that North Korea poses a bigger threat than Iraq and therefore we shouldn't be at war with Iraq, we should concentrate on where there is truly a threat.

What troubles me about such comments is the fact that we all know that when we are done with the Iraq threat, those hollywood folks aren't going to be supporting running over to North Korea (or Pakistan or Syria or Rwanda or Carjackistan or wherever) and taking care of that problem.

You make plenty of good points and I (dis)agree with some of them... :wink:

Don,

You also make some good points... not the least of which is the dishonest underlying nature of the "watermelons", which also permeates the aforementioned hollywood set... not to mention much of the media. And also the point about the Electoral College is good as well... Dana has also acknowledged that regardless of anyone's personal feelings, he IS our Commander in Chief... (CIF?)

Rather than take this thread off on a tangent, I will start another thread.
User avatar
Don Rearic
Posts: 697
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2002 6:01 am
Location: Absurdistan
Contact:

Post by Don Rearic »

I think "The Greens" would be best served by rooting out "The Watermelons." But because International Communist concerns have infested it with money and influence, I don't think it is going to happen, therefore I could never support them.

Hollywood is such a joke. Who was it that teamed up with Arianna Huffington for the Anti - SUV Campaign? Norman Lear I believe, has an ungodly amount of motor vehicles, which is perfectly fine. This is, after all, America, you can do as you please as long as you don't hurt anyone else. But then he says other people ARE hurting their fellow Citizens with their vehicles, yet he has many of them. Just like Rosie O'Donnell and the hypocrisy she showed by wanting her Bodyguard to be armed, but would not extend the same right to other people who cannot afford to hire someone for their Self-defense requirements.

What cranks me up about the whole - "George Bush stole the election! He's not even a legitimate President!" wailing is...that goes to the heart of what and where you think you live. What exactly is The United States of America? Alot of people heard and repeated "Democracy" for so damned long, they thought they actually lived in one and then woke up and said, "What happened?"

The Electoral College was put in place to keep the population centers from ruling over the other people in the country with a "like mind." The Founding Fathers never cease to amaze, if you think about it. They were incredibly intelligent men and had alot of vision.
Stultorum infinitus est numerus
User avatar
Panther
Posts: 2807
Joined: Wed May 17, 2000 6:01 am
Location: Massachusetts

Post by Panther »

Don Rearic wrote:The Electoral College was put in place to keep the population centers from ruling over the other people in the country with a "like mind." The Founding Fathers never cease to amaze, if you think about it. They were incredibly intelligent men and had alot of vision.
Very true... and it worked. No matter what side of the vote you were on in the last election, if it didn't become obvious that this country was/is divided you're still asleep. And it isn't conveniently divided along racial or religious lines, even though many would try to claim/exploit that thought. This country is divided along urban and rural lines... with those in the rural areas wanting to "conserve" the foundations of this nation and those "free thinkers" in the urban areas being the polar opposite. But just as the yin-yang symbol shows a little of the opposite in each... the same holds true here.
User avatar
Don Rearic
Posts: 697
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2002 6:01 am
Location: Absurdistan
Contact:

Post by Don Rearic »

Panther wrote:
...And it isn't conveniently divided along racial or religious lines, even though many would try to claim/exploit that thought. This country is divided along urban and rural lines... with those in the rural areas wanting to "conserve" the foundations of this nation and those "free thinkers" in the urban areas being the polar opposite.
I think you are correct, but then you can break it down along racial and religious, or lack of religious lines afterwards to further explain what is going on.

Politically Incorrect Ideas follow. Free Speech, yeah?

The Methodist Church has supported gun control for a very long time, one of the leading gun control orgs was at one time (it might still be there, I don't know), headquartered in the main Methodist Church (HQ) in Washington, D.C. (Fact, please don't make me look it up anyone, but I will if I have to...). They also had in a pamphlet about how even a woman should not resist a rapist because the rapist is still her neighbor or brother, I forget how they worded it at the moment.

Let a Methodist Minister spew that nonsense in rural America. He would not have a nice house and a Lincoln Town Car, he would not be very popular. In an urban or suburban environment, that can float. And it does. It has for years.

There are alot of things promoted in urban and suburban churches that won't float out in the countryside of this Nation.

Along racial lines, there are a whole lot of Oriental folks who are armed. There are alot of Black folks who are as well, legally and intend on using weapons in a safe and responsible manner and especially among these two groups, for Self-defense purposes more than hunting.

Yet, there are more Black folks who seem to look to Government for a solution they hold in their hands. They look to gun control to solve the problems of their friends, relatives and whatnot using firearms in a criminal manner. You are beginning to see this with Jury Nullification, in a city, everyone knows someone and when crime is absolutely out of control, almost everyone knows someone who is a victim of it or is perpetrating it.

In Baltimore, the general feeling is, if we just rid the country of firearms, everyone is going to be just fine because the firearm apparently has a devil inside of it which is preposterous. What about the knives too? Basically, the communities are in denial and they don't want to make hard choices, they want gun control but that won't work and then they raise all sorts of hell when someone wants something like "Project Exile" instituted to clean up the mess. Project Exile extracts the firearms offender from the community and ships them hundreds, if not thousands, of miles away so the network of criminality is completely severed.

Then people say, "But I won't be able to see my family member on weekends or even once a month."

That's why it is called "Project Exile."

It has worked very well in Virginia. It is now a major battle with the new Republican Governor in Maryland. He is now being roadblocked in the Maryland State Legislature by Democrats who are coming right out and saying it, "You're not passing Exile until you ban more guns."

At least they are honest this time around but it really goes to the heart of the matter, Democrats in this State don't give a damn about actually doing something about crime that has been proven to work, they just want to ban more firearms.

Because that's what they do, that's what they're good at, that's about all they are good at.

The "Free Thinkers" you cite, yeah, indeed they are, until you disagree with them, then the First Amendment might as well be the Second to them. All the "Pro-Choice" rhetoric goes out the window when you want to own a firearm or SUV, then they are not "Pro-Choice" at all...
Stultorum infinitus est numerus
User avatar
Dana Sheets
Posts: 2715
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 6:01 am

Post by Dana Sheets »

Don Rearic wrote:
He has won the vast majority, if not every, re-count in Florida which means he was elected. If that is not understood correctly, then the Electoral College is not understood and if that is not understood, I'm certainly not going to start a history class here to explain it.


-But the recounts didn't & don't matter. Because the supreme court ended the recount process - in effect - appointing Bush president. Ballot counts ex-post-facto did not weight into the decision the night the supreme court made it's decision. And since you've brought up the divide between racial/social lines of voting the many people who claim to have been barred from voting in certain municipalities in Florida could have very easily swung the vote. So the facts that will survive in history are the "official" facts. The Florida election was just a big ole mess - and counting the ballots of people that got to vote is only one layer of what happened in that state that day. Which again, doesn't matter now - in the end Bush ended up with the presidency.

I think the good old "Green Movement" would do itself a great favor by losing the Watermelon Element, meaning, those that are Green on the outside and Red on the inside. The spirit of it is hijacked by communists.

I don't want to be drinking dirty water, but I think Nader and many others also come up with some hairbrained schemes, there is alot about the movement that is rather wacky...


OK - a little language divide. I agree that Nader is quite wacky and probably has early-onset dementia. I am not particularly pro "Green Party" politics. What I was saying was that I do have strong leanings toward environmentalism.


Oh I know the gun thing would have been bad under Gore - but I'd still keep mine. :)

For a while, until they started charging you to keep it and making you jump through other hoops until it became impossible to do so.
No, I couldn't be more clear on this one. I'd keep mine. I've already kept it in places where it was illegal because I didn't agree with those laws and wrote letters to my (non-voting) representative {but don't get me started on that one} about it at the time. I would keep my firearm - period.
But sometimes it doesn't seem like this war added up to the sum of it's parts. There are many regimes in Africa that commit the same sorts of crimes against the people. There are other countries who have weapons of mass destruction. There are other countries who flaunt UN resolutions. There are other countries with ties to terrorism. There are other countries who fit the bill.


...There are few countries that fit ALL of those things at once, there are many that fit into the columns, in other words, but few that fit all of them to this degree. Syria and Iran are right on the list with Iraq and they should be dealt with in a similar manner if they don't learn the lesson from watching Iraq right now.



Now that point of view allows me to easily walk in the shoes of those outside of this country who could see such as series of invasions as Imperialistic - which I belive was part of the reason Japan bombed us back in WWII. We were creeping ever closer and closer by taking over territories, putting bases in the Phillipines...Wouldn't you be nervous if you were Russian or China watching what the US is doing now?

You also have to understand that 9-11-01 changed alot of things, while I don't think are liberties should be flushed because of it, I do believe the way we conduct business on an international should change and I see change for the better.

If weakness worked, 9-11-01 would have never happened. We were weak and they hit us anyway, like a common street thug,...


Yep.

...the only thing a terrorist understands and respects is brute force and deliberate violence.

And we need to be giving them a bellyfull of it instead of waffling about making anymore enemies. We already have them, we have some more friends when we lick our wounds and react with tears about our dead. When it comes time to kick ass, they shake their heads in bewilderment.

You're a bright person, I think the more you examine things, the more you will see and it might be an epiphany.


Thank you for the compliment. But I am in no way persuaded at this point that starting up a series of wars with low international support in multiple foreign counties without direct, tangible, evidentiary & clear provocation from those countries is a good idea. It only serves to reinforce the stereotypical image of America being an overgrown, milk-drinking baby that uses guns when it doesn't get it's way. (Not my stereotype mind you - I lived abroad for a year and had people from at least 10 different countries describe the USA to me this way. Didn't like it - but it was good to know that point of view was out there.) Now if we do the exact same thing WITH international support we might be viewed as leaders of the free world. But for now all I can see is a trend towards isolationism and roguish action that may lead to economic sanctions against us. And while the human cost of these war efforts is incalcuable, further contraction of our economy due to a loss of international business is about the last thing we need right now.

Dana
User avatar
Don Rearic
Posts: 697
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2002 6:01 am
Location: Absurdistan
Contact:

Post by Don Rearic »

Dana Sheets wrote:


But the recounts didn't & don't matter. Because the supreme court ended the recount process - in effect - appointing Bush president. Ballot counts ex-post-facto did not weight into the decision the night the supreme court made it's decision.
The Supreme Court ended the process because the Democrats were going to keep counting and calling for more re-counts and more "chad parameters" until they won.

Dana, come on now. The Democrats tried to exclude hundreds, if not thousands of Military Votes and we all know how the majority in the Military vote. They tried to have them neutralized on a technicality and deprive those who keep us free of their Right to Vote.

I remember it clearly, as much of a "Political Animal" as Panther is, I'm sure he does as well. The Democrats were going to keep counting and keep pushing for exclusion until they won Florida. That's why it had to be stopped, it was a circus.

Gore did not win, Bush did.
And since you've brought up the divide between racial/social lines of voting the many people who claim to have been barred from voting in certain municipalities in Florida could have very easily swung the vote.
If you really believe in this day and age where so many Black folks are in Law Enforcement that Black folks were turned away at official roadblocks and whatnot by Mighty white, Dear Lady, I don't know what to say because I don't want to insult you. You're smart, you've been snookered if you believe that. There is no way in Modern America where they are going to pull off Klan like behavior like that.
The Florida election was just a big ole mess - and counting the ballots of people that got to vote is only one layer of what happened in that state that day. Which again, doesn't matter now - in the end Bush ended up with the presidency.
It was a mess. I could be a real cynic and say that if someone is so stupid they cannot figure out a ballot, perhaps they're too stupid to vote as well. I'm borderline on that one. Bush did not end up with the Presidency, he won it.
I agree that Nader is quite wacky and probably has early-onset dementia. I am not particularly pro "Green Party" politics. What I was saying was that I do have strong leanings toward environmentalism.
The Democrat's Perot. :) Nader does have some value.

I have rather strong leanings and beliefs with regard to the environment as well. I have a young Son, I don't particularly want him to grow up in a Soylent Green environment.
Now that point of view allows me to easily walk in the shoes of those outside of this country who could see such as series of invasions as Imperialistic - which I belive was part of the reason Japan bombed us back in WWII. We were creeping ever closer and closer by taking over territories, putting bases in the Phillipines...Wouldn't you be nervous if you were Russian or China watching what the US is doing now?


Japan was becoming quite the Conqueror in that time frame as well. It was inevitable in many ways that it was going to happen.

As far as modern history, what is going on now, I think Russia and other countries see sweetheart oil deals with the Hussein Regime, as well as selling them AK-47s, AK-74, magazines in the hundreds of thousands, rounds in the hundreds of millions, RPGs, the grenades for them, hand grenades, antiquated night vision devices (NVDs) as well as GPS Jammers that are apparently not worth the batteries it takes to warm them up. :)

I don't think Russia is concerned in the slightest about us staying in Iraq or hurting them. I think they are concerned they won't get deals on the oil or be able to work within the arms race over there, ditto France (Supplied a Nuclear Reactor to Iraq in the early 80s which Israel destroyed...) and Germany.
Thank you for the compliment. But I am in no way persuaded at this point that starting up a series of wars with low international support in multiple foreign counties without direct, tangible, evidentiary & clear provocation from those countries is a good idea.
You're welcome. It's nice to have a chat with someone who is intelligent even if there is minor scraps in theory and ideology going on.

I think you have been watching the mainstream news too much. We have a coalition of 40+ countries as I understand it. Some liberal folks have countered, "Yeah, we have Britain and Australia and a bunch of other little countries that don't really count."

Well, if they don't count, why do the same liberals insist that they count as a valid holder of an opinion when it comes time for the U.N. Security Council to vote? See the double standard?

When they are going to vote against us, their vote should be equal, when they side with us, we bought them off (In some cases we did!) or they don't "count."

Not to be a "Secret Squirrel," but the Government is privy to alot of Intel that we are not and never will be. When Powell went before the U.N. and played the NSA Intercepts, I was against it because no matter how much we risk our Intelligence Networks, there will always be critics who say, "Yeah...but..."

They are already finding things in Iraq that clearly show we were right and our Intel was spot-on.
Now if we do the exact same thing WITH international support we might be viewed as leaders of the free world. But for now all I can see is a trend towards isolationism and roguish action that may lead to economic sanctions against us. And while the human cost of these war efforts is incalcuable, further contraction of our economy due to a loss of international business is about the last thing we need right now.

Dana
Have faith in this Country Dana. I promise you, the rest of the world will need us long before we need them. That is a worst case scenario. I like knives. I know a bit about steel. Some knives are made out of ATS-34 steel and some are made out of 154CM steel. They are almost identical and they're great steels, the only difference being, Crucible, an American Co., makes 154CM and Hitachi in Japan makes ATS-34. That is one example, a little bit of isolationism is not going to hurt this country. Perhaps we could finally turn back to actually helping our farmers and produce for our own people instead of ruining the farmers with all sorts of schemes and allowing banks to prey upon them. At the end of the day, we don't need a Toyota, BMW, Porsche, Mercedes or any other foreign vehicle. We could be making our own stuff and living in even more wealth, safety and comfort. Let them sanction us, because they will find out how great this country really is.

That is also one of the reasons I support solar power and drilling our own oil, self-sufficiency.

Ciao!
Stultorum infinitus est numerus
Gene DeMambro
Posts: 1684
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 1998 6:01 am
Location: Weymouth, MA US of A

Post by Gene DeMambro »

If you really believe in this day and age where so many Black folks are in Law Enforcement that Black folks were turned away at official roadblocks and whatnot by Mighty white, Dear Lady, I don't know what to say because I don't want to insult you. You're smart, you've been snookered if you believe that. There is no way in Modern America where they are going to pull off Klan like behavior like that.
In the 2000 election, federal election monitors acting under the auspices of the Voting Rights Act, monitored the elections in many Alabama counties due to continued violations of the Voting Rights Act in that state.

Gene
User avatar
Don Rearic
Posts: 697
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2002 6:01 am
Location: Absurdistan
Contact:

Post by Don Rearic »

Uh-huh. It's 1960! Again! Who'da thunk it?
Stultorum infinitus est numerus
User avatar
Panther
Posts: 2807
Joined: Wed May 17, 2000 6:01 am
Location: Massachusetts

Post by Panther »

Please don't get bogged down in the results of the last Presidential election. Allegations of vote tampering and people being denied to vote (among other things) have all been extensively researched and exhaustively investigated (I know of one such investigator in the aftermath of Florida's election crisis) AND the results of that research and investigation remain a bone of contention for many. The allegations, investigation, research and results, depending on the source, all have their own "spin" as it were... from BOTH sides.

At this point in the history of the USA, over two years later, those allegations and investigative results are a moot point. We have a President. Please continue the debate/discussion, but if anyone feels it is absolutely necessary to discuss those election results, start another thread.

Thank you.
User avatar
Panther
Posts: 2807
Joined: Wed May 17, 2000 6:01 am
Location: Massachusetts

Post by Panther »

Dana Sheets wrote:[No, I couldn't be more clear on this one. I'd keep mine. I've already kept it in places where it was illegal because I didn't agree with those laws and wrote letters to my (non-voting) representative {but don't get me started on that one} about it at the time. I would keep my firearm - period.
It really stinks that private (citizen) ownership of handguns (and many other types of firearms) in the District of Columbia is completely banned... :x

However, Dana... your last sentence is enough to make pro-gun guys go all goo-goo-eyed! :wink:
User avatar
Dana Sheets
Posts: 2715
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 6:01 am

Post by Dana Sheets »

ROTFL - Thanks Panther. I needed that. :D
I think you have been watching the mainstream news too much. We have a coalition of 40+ countries as I understand it. Some liberal folks have countered, "Yeah, we have Britain and Australia and a bunch of other little countries that don't really count."

Well, if they don't count, why do the same liberals insist that they count as a valid holder of an opinion when it comes time for the U.N. Security Council to vote? See the double standard?

When they are going to vote against us, their vote should be equal, when they side with us, we bought them off (In some cases we did!) or they don't "count."
Who are the current coalition members?

President Bush is assembling a Coalition that has already begun military operations to disarm Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction, and enforce 17 UNSC resolutions.

The Coalition will also liberate the Iraqi people from one of the worst tyrants and most brutal regimes on earth.

Contributions from Coalition member nations range from: direct military participation, logistical and intelligence support, specialized chemical/biological response teams, over-flight rights, humanitarian and reconstruction aid, to political support.

Forty-nine countries are publicly committed to the Coalition, including:

Afghanistan
Albania
Angola
Australia
Azerbaijan
Bulgaria
Colombia
Costa Rica
Czech Republic
Denmark
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Georgia
Honduras
Hungary
Iceland
Italy
Japan
Kuwait
Latvia
Lithuania
Macedonia
Marshall Islands
Micronesia
Mongolia
Netherlands
Nicaragua
Palau
Panama
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Rwanda
Singapore
Slovakia
Solomon Islands
South Korea
Spain
Tonga
Turkey
Uganda
Ukraine
United Kingdom
United States
Uzbekistan

This number is still growing, and it is no accident that many member nations of the Coalition recently escaped from the boot of a tyrant or have felt the scourge of terrorism. All Coalition member nations understand the threat Saddam Hussein's weapons pose to the world and the devastation his regime has wreaked on the Iraqi people.

The population of Coalition countries is approximately 1.23 billion people.
Coalition countries have a combined GDP of approximately $22 trillion.
Every major race, religion, ethnicity in the world is represented.
The Coalition includes nations from every continent on the globe.

source: http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/iraq/ ... 27-10.html
They always count. There are 191 member nations of the UN. Vatican City never joined. The US currently recognizes 192 countries - which leaves out lots of little territories & the like - but most of the world works on or about the 192 mark. So 49/192 is 25.5% give or take.

-for more info visit: http://www.countrywatch.org

Did we bribe many with aid packages? Of course. Business is business. Smaller countries would be silly to lose out on such an opportunity to have a nice chip to lay down when it comes to the time to divy up foreign aid packages. Except many stood on their principles and didn't join in and may miss out on many dollars. Does 1/4 of the world make it OK? Does that matter? Not really - Bush made it clear that he'd move forward without support if that's what it took.
...a little bit of isolationism is not going to hurt this country. Perhaps we could finally turn back to actually helping our farmers and produce for our own people instead of ruining the farmers with all sorts of schemes and allowing banks to prey upon them. At the end of the day, we don't need a Toyota, BMW, Porsche, Mercedes or any other foreign vehicle. We could be making our own stuff and living in even more wealth, safety and comfort. Let them sanction us, because they will find out how great this country really is.
The only reason most Americans can maintain the level of lifestyle they do is because products from underwear to shingles are made using cheap labor in poor countries. Foreign cars we might be able to live without. A steep drop in foreign trade would bring middle and lower income America into poverty and spark deep social unrest. I completely disagree that "we don't need you" is an answer to the current level of divide in the international dialogue. If our goals are truly liberty for all, justice for all, and freedom for all then we are called by these goals to continue to the dialogue, to urge and support change from within each country. And I pray and work towards the day when we will stop using warfare to generate freedom and instead find new a better ways through education, empowerment, and dialogue. My goal is to have that day come in my lifetime. Lofty? Perhaps - but if I don't work for it, then who will?

-Your Jack Daniels Drinking, Gun Toting, Martial Artist, Peace Loving, Patriotic as hell Dana - signing off for the night. :usa
User avatar
Don Rearic
Posts: 697
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2002 6:01 am
Location: Absurdistan
Contact:

Post by Don Rearic »

Whilst I clean the goo out of my eyes, if you were lucky enough to own a handgun and kissed the D.C. Government's ass before a date in 1975 that I cannot remember, you were allowed to keep your handgun(s). They could not be willed, sold, traded, given or passed on in any way...except to move out of the area. But they do exist. There is no provision for carrying them, not for mere mortals anyway.

After that deadline, if it was not registered, you are S.O.L. if you get caught with it.

***

My point of bringing up the number of coalition countries was just in response to a point you made, Dana. I don't really care if we went it alone. I don't ask my neighbor if it is "OK" that I defend myself, you wouldn't either.

Like I said, we had/have Intel that Hussein was a direct threat to our country.

Now, tonight, there is a report that we have troops on the ground that have tested positive for low level exposure to Sarin, a nerve agent. Vomiting, blotching discoloration of skin, dizziness, etc.

There are two ways the critics of the war can go with this information, one is wishful thinking and I think, living in a fantasy world and that would be...

"Hussein would have never used it against us HERE...no delivery system."

The delivery system would be International Terrorists. It's already established, please get over that if you can.

Next.

"Well, the U.S. has weapons of mass destruction and they have actually used them."

That is a moral equivalency argument that I am no longer going to entertain. Anyone that wants to think that way...let them think that way. I think it is "Blame America First" or "Hate America First" that get involved with that. I don't respect it, I think it is hateful to say it but it does not stop people from doing so.

Iraq was a threat...still is...won't be soon.

God bless.
Stultorum infinitus est numerus
jorvik

Post by jorvik »

quote
" Like I said, we had/have Intel that Hussein was a direct threat to our country"

He sure was, the guy just would not play ball, and look at all the weapons of mass destruction that the troops have found ( well actually they haven't found any :oops: .....it was weedkiller, but, Hell it coulda been Sarin)
And he was behind 9/11 and the war in Afghanistan ( All those guys on the planes were saudis, who are arabs......and Iraqis live in the desert to)..........and he invaded Kuwait, which is in America.

Dana................I thought that you were an intelligent girl and yet you missed all this :multi:

Now there are other enemies Syria, and Iran :snipersmile: .......and the Arabs in Korea pose a threat as well 8O
User avatar
Panther
Posts: 2807
Joined: Wed May 17, 2000 6:01 am
Location: Massachusetts

Post by Panther »

Thus far, the discussion/debate/dialog on this thread has been very good...

Don has made the statement that there was/is Intel about the threat of Iraq. Don can respond to jorvik's counters himself, however jorvik's post seemed rhetorical with a smattering of truth... Not necessarily disallowed, but not furthering the discussion or debate either.

Just an FYI: I won't let what has been a pretty good dialog/discussion degenerate.

With that in mind...
jorvik wrote:Dana................I thought that you were an intelligent girl and yet you missed all this
Dana is an intelligent woman. This comment, whether offensive to her or not, reads to me with an almost patronizing tone of condescension. If I read it that way, others may also... Please moderate this tone and make the necessary corrections.

Thank you...

Now back to the discussion...
Gene DeMambro
Posts: 1684
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 1998 6:01 am
Location: Weymouth, MA US of A

Post by Gene DeMambro »

It's 1960! Again! Who'da thunk it?
In certain voting sictricts in certain parts of certain states, it is.

Gene
Post Reply

Return to “Realist Training”