Stryke wrote:
now look at McCarthys tegumi drills especially the hooking and drawing elements ..
Got a link?
Stryke wrote:
can you not see the uechi draw on the limb for an outside entry , and a Sanchin thrust on the limb for an inside entry ?
Yes but I see the wauke component as applying as much on the inside as the outside reference point..or even...changing from inside to outside and back...

If you are speaking of the wing hand and then I still see that as working inside and outside.. Some have suggested that the outside line is superior and that the inside line is equal, but the mantis moves like the inside, while crane likes outside, and I think all of these inside systems address inside and outside control, you can't really have just one - just like ground fighters will train both side controls and mounts, guard, half guard, there are a lot of different positions to work.
The thrust thing is off line from a WCK standpoint still I agree that it seems to be an inside 'clear' but the centerline is off from how we use it.. This difference seems to manifest from the mantis vs snake influences, the snake in WCK, has this thrust start from the heart or center and shoots out rising a bit and riding the line, generally toward the eyes. That's the in-inside.
The sanchin thrust seems to take one of what I call the "double" centerlines that mantis sometimes uses. I do not fully understand how this structure relates to centerline control that they refer to but from what I know they seem to train splitting moves that seem to emulate the mandible of the mantis.
Mandible
Paired appendage of the 4th body segment that becomes the 1st pair of mouthparts, analogous to jaw. Used to chew, cut, and tear food, to carry things, to fight, and to mold wax. Move from side to side rather than up and down.
How many Uechi folks work on training grips that crush split and tear when they "grab"? That's what those jars are for and some CMA who train this stuff will make your arms bleed or worse if you play with them and they get a hold of your bridges.
Stryke wrote:
kotikitae using this method and transfers and traps and etc etc etc ......
Any clips of this drill?
Stryke wrote:
Isnt modern Uechi missing some basics of it`s past .
Only if by past you mean before it was called Uechi..
Stryke wrote:
Tegumi , kotakitae , Chi Sau ... whatever you wush to call it , it`s there , it`s evident , and it will make some seriously skilled martial artists .
Logic dictates that Kanbun and others who trained in China probably had exposure to similar training in China.. No telling though what the focus was on such drills, it could have been core training or it could have been ancillary depending on the teacher and what he was teaching. Some arts like WCK spend 80%-90% of their time training sticking and some spend just a little time on it, though most of the root and similar systems like mantis, crane, white eyebrow, etc do seem to focus on this study. This makes sense because when working at close range the use of sight or visual perception>reaction is asking too much of the CNS, there is no time so tactile perception>reaction training is critical for inside survival.
The sticking training makes training some things possible that otherwise either wouldn’t be or would take a very long time to develop otherwise. Sticking training takes the clash, which happens in the blink of an eye and puts it under a microscope, magnifies it a thousand percent and injects the lessons learned directly into the CNS via tactile and visual feedback. This gives folks the time to refine and cultivate critical attributes that normally exist in combat only for a split second. Many of the techniques in these styles are designed for this range and compressed time reaction with contact but without this kind of contact study many movements and postures will seem out of place or seem to have no reason for being..