The Horrors of an Around- the-block frock
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:21 pm
http://www.calendarlive.com/printeditio ... 1878.story
By Elizabeth Snead, Special to The Times
Chanel made a pretty big splash at Monday's Golden Globe awards. Chanel dresses were spotted on hot young actresses Reese Witherspoon, Emily Mortimer, Natalie Portman and Vanessa Paradis as they strolled the red carpet.
But many in the fashion world are wondering why Witherspoon ended up in a Chanel gown previously worn (horrors!) by Kirsten Dunst. Reportedly, Witherspoon was excited to wear a "vintage" gown, thinking "vintage" meant a classic frock worn in some bygone era. She had no idea it was a Dunst redux.
It was only after the Globes that Witherspoon's camp learned the dress was worn by Dunst to a 2003 Golden Globe Awards party, with her hair done just like Witherspoon's. Yikes.
Chanel issued a statement: "Chanel apologizes for the oversight that Reese Witherspoon's dress was previously worn to a Golden Globes after party three years ago. We are honored that Reese chose to wear Chanel and thought she looked beautiful. We congratulate her on her well-deserved win."
Witherspoon's publicist, Nancy Ryder, told reporters that she and her other clients will boycott Chanel. And other stars' stylists are aghast that this duplication occurred.
"A star in the best actress category should never be seen in a dress that's been seen before anywhere, even on the runway," sniffed a top L.A. fashion public relations agent. "Most actresses today insist on a couture gown, specially made for them."