And I'm ashamed that Berns is an American.I sort of felt ashamed, and didn't really want to be associated with being an American.
Berns Rothchild
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&c ... &printer=1
And I'm ashamed that Berns is an American.I sort of felt ashamed, and didn't really want to be associated with being an American.
Berns Rothchild
Even for folks who believe in "The War on Terror", many of the things that have been passed into law are... well... disturbing. The "PATRIOT" act, the numerous laws/regulations surrounding the way folks are treated while traveling, the continued attempts at codifying a national ID card (and the back-door, end-run around any opposition by mandating "uniform guidelines for State driver's licenses"), preventing people from criticizing incumbents within 60 days of an election (news media exempted of course)... I know that it is hard to believe for some folks on the forums, but the truth is that I don't agree with many (if not most) of these new laws/regulations/measures. They go against the things that make us... well... "Americans". It is interesting to note that while Clinton was in office, a very large segment of the population spent considerable energy to prevent or mitigate (sometimes successfully, sometimes not) his support and plans for stomping on our Rights, BUT since the election from the other party and the subsequent War, those folks have stood by while many of the same measures that they fought against under Clinton have been passed into law!IJ wrote:Welcome to indefinite, perpetual war, folks... the war on terror, of which the war in Iraq is ostensibly a subset, has no end in sight, has an ill defined foe, and may continue for decades in the absence of any real attacks. And we're to suspend the freedom of speech while we're "at war?" Sounds like 1984 to me.
IMNSHO, the history of those valid criticisms during the Clinton adminstration and now the tacit approval during the Bush admistration for similar laws/proposals/regulations bears creedence to your observation. The only thing I would disagree with in this paragraph is the "need" for calling it a "rather close" election. More people voted for Bush than for Clinton in either of his wins... and Bush actually won with a greater margin than Kennedy in 60. I just think we need to get away from that and to the real issues you already mentioned.I dunno, there's a lot of this on both sides. This lady isn't exactly part of the mainstream left or typical for a "blue state." On the other side, some of the "compassionate conservatives," have looked at this second, rather close election as a mandate to charge ahead victoriously with some of the divisive campaign issues rather than a time to heal wounds and reach compromises. I feel certain that some of those who oppose any ill word of the president or military operations during times of conflict wouldn't have hesitated to heap criticism on Kerry--because they already did it to Clinton.
Now... That's the best advice of all. Most times, these folks just aren't worth the time and effort it takes to get upset over them. I'd disagree if she was working to stomp on Freedom or force an agenda on folks with phoney statistics or something, but... You know... There are blue anodized bracelets that you can buy and wear that have a POW/MIA name & info on them. I have a friend and she wears one for her uncle who never came back from VietNam. Now someone might just assume that she's against Bush, but that's not what it is at all.I'd say ignore this woman. We're giving her a lot of press by saying anything about her, and she isn't worth getting worked up over.
More than anything else, I think that's what bothers so many of us so much about these types of attitudes. We have different views on many different things, but in the end, either you're an American or you're not. If you don't like it so much that you say things about leaving because of who's in office THIS time or because someone said or did something you don't agree with, then... LEAVE and don't let the proverbial door hit you in @$$! That's what ticked off a lot of folks about the hollywood, entertainment and media folks. It went beyond just disagreeing or campaigning for or against something or someone. So many of them took the position that THEY were right in their views and no other view should even remotely be considered... and if the other side WAS considered, well... They'd just take their ball and leave the country... Pfffft! AND... That's why so many folks have said, "OK, puhleeze... leave now." Sure, we all disagree, but here, on THIS forum, we TRY to be civil about and listen to the thoughts and opinions of each other. It doesn't always work out that way and there have been folks (regardless of what some people may think) both "blue" AND "red" who've been told one way or another, "don't bother coming here anymore, we don't play like that." But when Clinton was in office the hollywood, entertainment, and media folks basically wouldn't listen to anyone saying anything against him UNTIL it was made into a big deal and had to be blown way out of proportion sometimes. Most of those folks basically treated anyone who criticized Clinton with a "Nyah, Nyah, Na, Nyah, Nyah" attitude. However now that Bush has won, the outcry is for "reconciliation" and "appeasing" and "inclusion" and the accusations of divisiveness abound. And then... in the middle of all that... who are the ones that keep throwing the "divisive" bombs by doing things like making "blue" bracelets? On the other hand, it seems that anyone who is unapologetically pro-Bush speaks up, they get slammed.Mills75 wrote:I just don't like to see anti American sentiment in print from so called fellow Americans like Berns.