http://www.shadowsofnamek.com/forum/sho ... ge=1&pp=30
pat him on the back for intellegence and kick him in the head for being underhanded.
Guy sells X-BOX, PHOTO for 600 or so bucks......
Moderator: Available
genetic pool needs a kick in the...
The guy said I decieved him. I don't see any deception at all
I have known individuals like the seller of the photo (we all do)
It is a characteristic that my children have thankfully avoided, being a "bottom dweller" is an unfortunate waste of a life.
Would be an excellent practical joke but to take it furthur makes a mockery of who you are as a person.
Pat on the back for intellegence? Hmmmm... sorry but I disagree with that totally and I sense no intellengent life form in his postings...so "beam me up" I must move on .
Pat yourself on the back for not being like him instead and put more effort in the kick to his head.
Léo
What does this have to do with karate?
Nothin!
The Dragon likes to twist, wind, and coil. No rules apply; an attack will occur when you least expect it.
Re: What does this have to do with karate?
moral ethics...Ruiner wrote:Nothin!
many topics have nothing to do with karate such as cars, cooking etc...But it was stated " kick him in the head " soooo....could argue that in court
Léo
-
-Metablade-
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:54 pm
It's clearly deceptive.
The subject contained no mention of the photo only, and the "perception of the buyer" would be clearly under reasonable conditions that it was for the unit itself, and we have no way of knowing if the buyer perhaps was older, couldn't see well, ( like a grandma buying a present for her grandchild with her Social security savings.)
This scum is intentionally out to victimize people here.
As well, the words "Auction is for photo only" are not listed in large type, but small. If the attempt was not to defraud, why make them small?
Also, the retard could have stopped the auction at any time, but allowed it to continue.
The idea is not if the customer "should have known better" but rather, is the seller clearly attempting to defraud the consumer? Obviously he is, and we even have the hindsight
to see him bragging about it. on a public forum.
Yeah. That's real smart...what a fiery intellect he is.
Oops? What the...? Did my email client just fire off an letter to ebay's abuse dept? I hate it when it does that....
This jackass is a criminal, plain and simple.
If I were the buyer, I'd sue. We'd see who had the last laugh. What'll be even funnier, is if the dummy tries to pursue legal action to collect.
Audaciously, he even got another ebay seller to endorse him, (which is also fraud considering that the photo seller never had a transaction) The endorser sells DVDs. Wanna bet that they are bootlegged?
I am certain his days as an ebay client are numbered.
The subject contained no mention of the photo only, and the "perception of the buyer" would be clearly under reasonable conditions that it was for the unit itself, and we have no way of knowing if the buyer perhaps was older, couldn't see well, ( like a grandma buying a present for her grandchild with her Social security savings.)
This scum is intentionally out to victimize people here.
As well, the words "Auction is for photo only" are not listed in large type, but small. If the attempt was not to defraud, why make them small?
Also, the retard could have stopped the auction at any time, but allowed it to continue.
The idea is not if the customer "should have known better" but rather, is the seller clearly attempting to defraud the consumer? Obviously he is, and we even have the hindsight
to see him bragging about it. on a public forum.
Yeah. That's real smart...what a fiery intellect he is.
Oops? What the...? Did my email client just fire off an letter to ebay's abuse dept? I hate it when it does that....
This jackass is a criminal, plain and simple.
If I were the buyer, I'd sue. We'd see who had the last laugh. What'll be even funnier, is if the dummy tries to pursue legal action to collect.
Audaciously, he even got another ebay seller to endorse him, (which is also fraud considering that the photo seller never had a transaction) The endorser sells DVDs. Wanna bet that they are bootlegged?
I am certain his days as an ebay client are numbered.
There's a bit of Metablade in all of us.
and very good post
-
-Metablade-
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:54 pm
I also wanted to mention that the claim that he was selling the "photo" only won't hold up either, because that photo obviously belongs to another commercial site and is therefore copyrighted material.
So even if ebay is on crack and doesn't ban this clown for the other issues, they can receive legal action themselves if they knowingly allow copywritten material to be specifically be sold using their services.
It would be a form a facilitation.
And of course, this whole issue could be just one big fat troll.
So even if ebay is on crack and doesn't ban this clown for the other issues, they can receive legal action themselves if they knowingly allow copywritten material to be specifically be sold using their services.
It would be a form a facilitation.
And of course, this whole issue could be just one big fat troll.
There's a bit of Metablade in all of us.
