Uechi (like most southern styles) and MT use different structures, mechanics, tools and different "ideas" in terms of attack and defense.. Both styles have also changed in recent times..
But I mean for crying out loud there isn't even a Round Kick in any Uechi kata... take this and the fact that MT uses FISTED hand strikes most of the time and you see two huge differences that are minimized in the same breath by saying--it's all in Uechi.. You can't have it both ways, or worse ALL WAYS and make real sense anyway..

I understand that folks do not want to incur the wrath of "Borg Bill". Suggesting that any art is different than Uechi may well be taken to say that Uechi is then NOT LIKE that style, which implies that BIll's Uechi is NOT something that Bill wants to claim direct or indirect ownership of which seems to be almost everything. Otherwise, saying Uechi does not have "something" found in another style may also be taken to suggest that something is lacking in Uechi, or Bill's Uechi--or so it seems--an indirect "diss".
This *all is in Uechi* is the universal benefit of the "don't box me in" position and the finger pointing utility; It allows one domain over everything.. But whatever... You are welcome to this position Bill if you really want it and can handle the responsibility..


I say speak the damned truth as you see it, despite how PC it may or may not be!!!!!!!!