Research reference : syllabus of Uechi Kambun's school

Bill's forum was the first! All subjects are welcome. Participation by all encouraged.

Moderator: Available

Post Reply
jorvik

Post by jorvik »

there are certainly similarities in some of the techniques of Wing-Chun and Uechi...but I think all the tenseing and huffing and puffing stuff is totally alien to WC.although I've seen similar in Hung-Gar ( i'e. the Iron Wire form)
Which makes me think that this was a thing for demonstrations only...and got a bit out of hand :lol: ..............I know that at the last Uechi club I went to I was appalled at how little they did to protect their heads, they kept their hands down and made all sorts of tstsing noices :oops: .............now if they ever got into a streetfight then the guy they were fighting wouldn't know that he was supposed to hit their body and he would go straight for the head :lol: :lol: I know I would...and when I did at the Uechi club they'd get all upset and tell me it wasn't a boxing club :roll: ..... ( between you and I the best Uechi style fighter that I have ever seen did Goju)
Victor Smith
Posts: 203
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 2:17 am
Location: Derry, NH, USA
Contact:

Post by Victor Smith »

Hi Bill,

I think it depends on the group. I know Goju groups that begin with Sanchin, and there are even some Isshinryu groups that begin with Sanchin.

The To'on ryu version of Sanchin (also from Hiagonna Kanryo) is done with normal breathing and much softer movement than the Goju versions.

For myself Sanchin was taught as a brown belt. And yes it was not used but an exercise. When I began the study of tai chi 30 years ago I found a personal conflict between my sanchin studies and my tai chi studies that caused me a lot of personal difficulty.

Many years ago when a Uechi student, Tom Chan, joined our program and he shared his Sanchin I discovered a real conflict in myself with your Sanchin's more natural energy release. It took me about 17 years but I eventually began to practice our Isshinryu Sanchin with normal breathing and at full speed without Sanchin tension.

Personally I found it enlightening, a real energy pump and resovled never to return to the prior practice again, and I only teach it full speed now too, but still at brown belt.

In turn I utilize every aspect of my Sanchin for defensive application.

On the whole I find our Sanchin a really great way to work into an attack.
Victor Smith
bushi no te isshinryu
User avatar
Glenn
Posts: 2199
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2001 6:01 am
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska

Post by Glenn »

Bill Glasheen wrote: The popular vein-popping, closed fisted, hissing version seen in Goju and Isshin Ryu comes from Higaonna's form which he got from China. More importantly, Goju and Isshin Ryu don't even practice the damn thing until green/brown belt level. And you never see most of the folks in those styles actually use it in their sparring and fighting.
<snip>
The fact that Uechika start with Sanchin makes the style unique on Okinawa.
My understanding is that Higaonna started with Sanchin when he taught after returning from China. Modern Goju Ryu doesn't start with Sanchin because Miyagi (and others) added several new Okinawan-derived kata such as the Gekisai in front of it...you have to work your way up to the old kata that Higaonna brought back from China. Goju has given classification names to the "old" kata versus "new" kata, discussed in one of Seikichi Toguchi's books, but I forget the terms.
f.Channell wrote: Miyagi closed the fist in Sanchin.

He stated it had been open before.

According to him, Higaonna would have had an open hand. Probably like Uechi
Here is the list of changes I have seen attributed to Miyagi that makes modern Goju Sanchin different from Higaonna's original Sanchin:
1. Higaonna performed open hand; Miyagi changed it to close fist
2. Higaonna performed 180 degree turns in his Sanchin; Miyagi changed this to moving backward instead of turning (although I believe some Goju teachers have added some turns as well)
3. Higaonna used more "natural" breathing and movements; Miyagi added the forced hissing and slow forced movements
Most of this comes from discussions on CyberDojo and other websites and I cannot attest to the accuracy of the info. If it is accurate then Goju Sanchin is quite different from Higaonna's Sanchin, which sounds from this to have been more like Uechi Sanchin.
Glenn
User avatar
Bill Glasheen
Posts: 17299
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am
Location: Richmond, VA --- Louisville, KY

Post by Bill Glasheen »

Great info from all.
Glenn wrote:
Although my understanding is that Higaonna started with Sanchin when he taught after returning from China. Modern Goju Ryu doesn't start with Sanchin because Miyagi (and others) added several new Okinawan-derived kata such as the Gekisai in front of it...you have to work your way up to the old kata that Higaonna brought back from China. Goju has given classification names to the "old" kata versus "new" kata, discussed in one of Seikichi Toguchi's books, but I forget the terms.
This is complicated.

The Goju forms are divided between the "classical" and the "instructional" forms.

Different Goju schools have different numbers of the instructional forms. They're all based more or less on Gekisai. But if my memory serves me well, my Shorei Kai branch of Goju had a mind-numbing 10 instructional forms that differed only by a move or two from one to the next.

There were several of each of the following, from most basic to most advanced.
  • Fukyu
  • Gekisai
  • Gekiha
  • Kakuha
The forms started very simple, and were very symmetrical in nature. In other words you generally did moves on both sides of the body. They were highly amenable to bunkai that flowed easily from technique to technique. They started simple, and evolved to a Seisan-like form, and ultimately to a form twice as complicated as Seisan.

The original original classical forms from Higaonna consisted of
  • Sanchin
  • Seisan
  • Sanseiryu
  • Pechurin or Suparinpei
More however were added, and it is belived they came from Higaonna's further studies in China.

When I started Goju, I did indeed start with some of the instructional forms. However my first classical form was Saifa. Then I did Seiunchin - the form seen practiced by Miyagi and Daniel in Karate Kid II. Sanchin came after that, followed by Seisan. Then the other forms were inserted. Suparinpei was the last taught. (I was never taught Goju Suparinpei, though I've judged it many a time at tournaments. Nice form... 8) )
Glenn wrote:
Here is the list of changes I have seen attributed to Miyagi that makes modern Goju Sanchin different from Higaonna's original Sanchin:
1. Higaonna performed open hand; Miyagi changed it to close fist
2. Higaonna performed 180 degree turns in his Sanchin; Miyagi changed this to moving backward instead of turning (although I believe some Goju teachers have added some turns as well)
3. Higaonna used more "natural" breathing and movements; Miyagi added the forced hissing and slow forced movements
Most of this comes from discussions on CyberDojo and other websites and I cannot attest to the accuracy of the info. If it is accurate then Goju Sanchin is quite different from Higaonna's Sanchin, which sounds from this to have been more like Uechi Sanchin.
To the best of my knowledge, this is correct.

There's nothing particularly un-Sanchin about what Miyagi did to Sanchin kata. He just changed the way you do it. He changed a study of movement into a warmup exercise.

I take the breathing and dynamic tension out of Goju Sanchin and run with it - all the time. I prefer using this to other methods for warming various body parts up. But I don't limit "it" just to the movements of Sanchin. I do overheads, rotator cuff cranks, trunk flexes in myriad directions, agonizingly slow dynamic tension kicks, etc., etc. Good stuff! 8)

So what I'm saying is that Miyagi's Sanchin is a warmup overcoat clothed onto Sanchin. You can use the coat with other clothing, and you can wear your Sanchin without the coat. If that makes sense.

- Bill
User avatar
Bill Glasheen
Posts: 17299
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am
Location: Richmond, VA --- Louisville, KY

Post by Bill Glasheen »

By the way...

If there's one Goju form that's worth stealing for Uechika, it would be Tensho. It's one of the "classical" forms, although I believe it's Miyagi's work. VERY nice form...

And it is done with the Goju Sanchin style breathing, although generally not in the vein-popping manner you see many do it.

See the following

Tensho

Chuck Merriman and Tensho

- Bill
MikeK
Posts: 3664
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 9:40 pm

Post by MikeK »

I was dreaming of the past...
User avatar
Bill Glasheen
Posts: 17299
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am
Location: Richmond, VA --- Louisville, KY

Post by Bill Glasheen »

William Cheung's Biu Gee is more "the real deal."

The applications on the first video missed the mark for a lot of reasons. Too much small motor coordination - the cutsie stuff like you see in a small part of aikido that doesn't work under stress. And I didn't like his interpretation of the "reverse cross block." I like to use that to set up hawk chases sparrow. But then that's my thing. 8)

Thanks for the videos, Fred. Wish I had a good WC teacher who could run through that form with me. There's lots of really good stuff there.

- Bill
MikeK
Posts: 3664
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 9:40 pm

Post by MikeK »

Fred? :? Has that all that ukemi without mats taken it's toll? :lol:
I was dreaming of the past...
User avatar
Bill Glasheen
Posts: 17299
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am
Location: Richmond, VA --- Louisville, KY

Post by Bill Glasheen »

I'm with Fred on this, Mike. But it's subtle. You have to stare at and work with Wing Chun a while to see "it" in Uechi. But it is there.

When I choreographed my 12 Uechi Hojoundo flow drills, I stole liberally from ideas I picked up from Wing Chun.

If you're a karate guy, you see the karate in Uechi. If you're a sport fighter, you see the sport applications in Uechi. If you're a Chinese martial artist, you see the flowing, inside-fighting, CMA in Uechi (per Jim's constant rants). If you're a Muay Thai guy, you can see the elbows and knees and clenches in Uechi. If you're a grappler, you see the grappling applications in Uechi. The system is kind of like that. It's a very succinct and generic study of motion with lots of directions to take it.

It's we practitioners who hose it - trying to put it in a box it never was intended to be in - IMNSHO.

- Bill
User avatar
Glenn
Posts: 2199
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2001 6:01 am
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska

Post by Glenn »

Jorvik mentioned Hung Gar's Iron Wire (also called Iron Thread) form, here are some clips of it, showing some variations in interpretation:

complete form with a lot of slow dynamic tension:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDTniv8P ... ed&search=

complete form by the son of the guy above, faster with less of the slow dynamic tension:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M02E5hXL ... ed&search=

snippets of it performed by an elder Chan Honjung (1909-1991), more fluidity here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qE-KH9tF ... ed&search=

first part of the form, only shows upper body:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTUE1zZS ... ed&search=
Glenn
maxwell ainley
Posts: 1690
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2001 6:01 am
Location: england

Post by maxwell ainley »

Great speculation and exellent points ,but what about actually training the syllabus of Kanbun ,three kata ,conditioning,kake/arm pounding ,jars ,makabe-gu and spontaeneous attack and defence sparring ,from the kata.
max ainley
User avatar
Bill Glasheen
Posts: 17299
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am
Location: Richmond, VA --- Louisville, KY

Post by Bill Glasheen »

It's a great syllabus, Max.

We're just pondering the choreographer of it all. Obviously it wasn't from spontaneous generation.

Give two people a mechanical clock. Some will wind it up and put it on the shelf. The next person will get the toolkit out and take it apart.

When I was a young lad, they kept me away from all mechanical things they didn't want disassembled into many pieces. :lol:

- Bill
MikeK
Posts: 3664
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 9:40 pm

Post by MikeK »

Bill Glasheen wrote:I'm with Fred on this, Mike. But it's subtle. You have to stare at and work with Wing Chun a while to see "it" in Uechi. But it is there.
What you takin about Willis? I posted the Wing Chun videos. :lol:
I was dreaming of the past...
User avatar
mhosea
Posts: 1141
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 9:52 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Post by mhosea »

maxwell ainley wrote:Great speculation and exellent points ,but what about actually training the syllabus of Kanbun ,three kata ,conditioning,kake/arm pounding ,jars ,makabe-gu and spontaeneous attack and defence sparring ,from the kata.
I suspect this matches my preferences, but I have to be careful because I have no idea what "makabe-gu" means. What does it mean?
Mike
User avatar
Bill Glasheen
Posts: 17299
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am
Location: Richmond, VA --- Louisville, KY

Post by Bill Glasheen »

My bad, Mr K. A short between the headsets.

- Bill
Post Reply

Return to “Bill Glasheen's Dojo Roundtable”