Van Canna wrote:Good points Shana. “Street fighting” as used in discussions is a misnomer, as it connotes something other than ‘self protection’ …something that may come our way despite our avoidance efforts. And when it comes…self protection_ may define_ physical, emotional or both.
I think this is covered in your current thread on silliness in the MAs. I think it sounds impressive to talk about street fighting because it puts you into a realm that others rarely traverse, so one can walk around and puff out their chest (which actually looks kinda silly, truly). But as your thread notes, we can't forget that sparring in the dojo or in tournament is really just practice for those times when you might need it. Most folks, I believe, will have little need to fully utilize their training outside of sanctioned training or competition, but it never hurts to be prepared.
Van Canna wrote:What it boils down to is this: The sound body requires much work with a healthy lifestyle, defeat of obesity_ smoking, and alcohol consumption. The sound body also calls for aerobic capacity training on regular basis so that it won’t quit on you suddenly under the load of extreme stress you will feel when someone is trying to hurt you bad or kill you.
Fortunately for me, this is one of the reasons I took up martial arts, as a way to combat my weight and diabetes. I've still got a long road to travel toward the healthy and sound body I should have, but I find that the physical and mental discipline of Uechi has certainly helped me in the right direction.
Again, I think many of us train for the joy, knowledge, and health of it, and a large majority of folks don't live the healthy lifestyle they know they should in order to be their strongest selves. Can we truly call ourselves martial artist when we are fat and out of shape? Is it the spirit of person that defines a martial artist or ability?
Based on the reports from summer camp, I'd say that's not so easily defined.
Van Canna wrote:To remember in ‘self protection’ is that when it happens, especially for women, it will come from a larger, stronger, vicious opponent, possibly multiples, and most likely armed.
With all due respect, I really think that's too narrowly stated, Vann. While most women are usually going to be smaller than their opponent, a large number of men will be as well. That, and women often fight for different motivations and goals, and can sometimes be more vicious because of it. I'm not going to go out and pick a fight just to prove I have large...um...kahunas, but if you threaten my baby daughter, you will likely pull back a nub, and I would be willing to die to protect her and/or assure she gets away safely.
As a culture, we have this belief that women, because they are the "fairer sex" are naturally weaker and smaller and should be protected. While I think that is true for some women, I also think it's a bit chauvinistic or perhaps wishful thinking to believe it only applies to women.
Particularly in today's world, there is a LOT of
overweight, or simply non-active and self-absorbed individuals that wouldn't have the first clue how to defend themselves without a game controller in hand. These are the same folks that walk around with ear buds in their ears and are completely unaware of their surroundings. They are in a techno bubble and believe this keeps them safe.
Now, I will be the FIRST to admit that I love my palm phone and the things I can do on it and my pc, but I do not use it to the exclusion of my surroundings or my safety.
The point I'm trying to make - -as I try to reign in my mini rant

- - is that it's an individual issue, not a woman only issue, that your opponent will usually be larger or stronger than you.
And in the case of multiple attackers...gender really doesn't matter as it is simply a matter of numbers vs. attitude and skill. As you noted in your last post, a quick and violent response can sometimes offset numerical superiority...but again, this was attitude and skill...not gender. And, as I noted above, male or female, if you threaten our children...all bets are off....at least, I would HOPE so!
Van Canna wrote:
But the most important predatory concepts you need to determine if they are for you to develop are the following:
1. Righteous indignation
2. Instant action
3. Correct action
4. Explosive power in every move you make
5. Decisiveness under pressure
6. Coolness under pressure
7. Ruthlessness
8. Controlled ferocity
Okay, I can understand 2-8. They all make logical and tactical sense to me. But #1 seems kinda self-defeating. Perhaps it is how I am defining the term? Can you clarify this one?
Sorry for the rant, but thanks for the good discussion!