Entering the low stance

Bill's forum was the first! All subjects are welcome. Participation by all encouraged.

Moderator: Available

candan
Posts: 235
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 6:01 am
Location: Canada

Entering the low stance

Post by candan »

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Not to be a contrary but...stops relative to what? To oneself? To the floor? To the
opponent? To a car we are riding in? Einstein would chuckle at such a concept, and so
would any classical, Newtonian physicist. As Einstein would say, "It's all relative."
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Einstein also stated "Imagination is more important than knowledge" Therefore, I do not think he would chuckle . Image <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> Watch the film, frame by frame. This fellow never stops moving from the initial bouncing
to the hands thrust in the air. It's actually all quite fluid. And there's no doubt that this
gentleman was effective. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Anyway, I still think the forward movement of the fighter ceased as the foot landed, the motion did not I agree. Watching frame by frame IS relative as human movement is not rolling but stepping it has to have stop-go to some degree, that is what jars the body in running or walking even on the smoothest surfaces. Observe closely and he does stop. The momentum was transfered to the upper body as best as I can tell..wicked punch regardless.
Excellent debate and the passion shown will fuel more interesting points.
Leo

[This message has been edited by candan (edited March 12, 2002).]
User avatar
Bill Glasheen
Posts: 17299
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am
Location: Richmond, VA --- Louisville, KY

Entering the low stance

Post by Bill Glasheen »

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote
Watching frame by frame IS relative as human movement is not rolling but stepping it has to have stop-go to some degree, that is what jars the body in running or walking even on the smoothest surfaces.
Actually what best models or simulates reality changes as we go from a slow crawl up stairs to running on a surface. When we slowly go upstairs, it is indeed like a start/stop model. But when we run, our feet are more like the pistons of an engine that is driving the car. If you suddenly put the car in neutral, you will see that the car is not stopping. Each explosion of the piston (each step of the feet) does not result in a de novo movement of the car (the body) from a dead start. <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote
I still think the forward movement of the fighter ceased as the foot landed, the motion did not I agree.
This is actually kind of tricky. To some extent I agree with you. If we are just doing kata and crushing the air molecules in front of us, then the forward foot does indeed kill (rather than add to) virtually all of the forward momentum (as in the forward elbow strike talked about earlier). If not, we'd keep going until we crashed into the wall. When fist contacts jaw or elbow contacts opponent, it gets a little more interesting. Some of that energy enters the opponent. We want to fix it so that we are taking all the forward momentum we generate when coming forward (note the exlosive lunge in the mpeg file) and putting as much of that as possible into the opponent (transfering the energy in an inelastic collision) and as little as possible into "braking" with the front foot. Otherwise, we pee away perfectly good energy. This is why some folks suggest to hit before front foot contacts in such situations. The "explosion" of contact in this scenario comes from a pumping of the driving leg (rear) upon contact. That can be felt when hitting a really heavy bag.

It could be that the puncher stops forward momentum in the scenario because the victim absorbed all the energy. Certainly he took a lot of it. But if you look carefully, he IS braking and getting the heck out of the way to keep the victim from falling on his front leg.

Reality is never as simple as the blackboard theory, but the principles remain.

- Bill
User avatar
Van Canna
Posts: 57244
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am

Entering the low stance

Post by Van Canna »

Interesting discussion indeed, and good points from both camps.

As always it is matter of individual interpretation. Still we are ducking the question as to the why/what is the message of the technique as shown by Toyama sensei and Kihohide sensei.

And to the sweeping, here are my views:

I came to Uechi Ryu from Judo. I was taught to sweep my opponent on the way in to me when his weight was not settled down and I could use his momentum against him.

I was told not to attempt a sweep once the forward foot landed as his weight settled, or I would be sweeping my dreams mostly, besides spraining my ankle and knee when using the inside of the foot for a sweep.

Sure enough, in my randori matches, and later, in my karate sparring matches, the opponents caught on the way in would tumble like duckpins. This is the same technique Bob Campbell uses to a great advantage.

Once a strong opponent, well versed in Tobikomi, lands his weight, you will have a difficult time sweeping him. It is easy to find this out on the Dojo floor.

Quite logical, in my opinion. As you move into me you are most vulnerable, as your momentum is your enemy in spite of perceived advantage.

This is one of the lessons of Toyama sensei’s “Tobikomi” teaching concept, which was the manner in which Kanbun taught it, according to master Toyama.

Like we said before Bill, different strokes for different folks. Image

------------------
Van Canna

[This message has been edited by Van Canna (edited March 12, 2002).]
User avatar
Bill Glasheen
Posts: 17299
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am
Location: Richmond, VA --- Louisville, KY

Entering the low stance

Post by Bill Glasheen »

Van

I will not put myself in the position of disrespecting any great, experienced master. On the other hand, it's easy to play point, and counterpoint with multiple, experienced masters that each have their own views of the world. I am quite happy living in such a world. I've never taken any set of rules too seriously. I believe statements like that are made to help people understand concepts, but concepts become rather fluid in application. Folks like me who have done both theoretical and applied mathematics have a great appreciation for that. <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote
all physical movement stops at one time
And then we have...

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote
When a car stops suddenly the sudden lack of the cars movement is felt inside the car
Not to be a contrary but...stops relative to what? To oneself? To the floor? To the opponent? To a car we are riding in? Einstein would chuckle at such a concept, and so would any classical, Newtonian physicist. As Einstein would say, "It's all relative."

Watch the film, frame by frame. This fellow never stops moving from the initial bouncing to the hands thrust in the air. It's actually all quite fluid. And there's no doubt that this gentleman was effective. <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote
all physical movement stops at one time
If you move the way I suggest (have the fist hit before the front foot), there is a point in time where one's body briefly freezes its posture - while still moving through the target. That's not a bad thing! That would certainly fit the concept this master is conveying. However the concept has been broadened past what some are attempting to constrain it to. I'm not willing to limit myself that way.

Math applied to real life is different than what one preaches in the ivory tower. The same is true for fighting. When you watch what actually works, it's often much more complex and more interesting than how we might imagine while pondering at rest. Nevertheless, the proper concepts are there right in front of us - if we look closely enough - often with intricate movement layered on top. When you see a great fighter bob and weave and bouce and then throw an ippon, you may not see sanchin. But if it's done properly, I do.

- Bill
User avatar
gmattson
Site Admin
Posts: 6073
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 1998 6:01 am
Location: Lake Mary, Florida
Contact:

Entering the low stance

Post by gmattson »

I believe the stomping (noise making, hard hitting) to the floor may have some distraction purpose,should the attack miss or be short, but the real purpose is simply creating dynamic forward movement to augment any attacking technique using the arms.

Roy Bedard, while training the Mexican police, used a drill with his baton, showing how much more powerful the hit was, when it was delivered just before the forward foot struck the floor. The more powerful the lunging movement, the more powerful the hit. Naturally, this can be more easily taught using a stomping movement, as long as the "kimi" is accomplished just before the forward foot hits (stomps) the floor.

You could tell by the sound made by the batons hitting the focus mits, how effective this was, versus the hit as, or after the forward foot struck. (regardless how powerful the stomp)

------------------
GEM
Guest

Entering the low stance

Post by Guest »

This has been in my eyes one of the most interesting threads in a long time.

Sensei's, please let me pose a few questions at this point.

If one is delivering a power shot (like in this clip) and the blow is delivered with the rear hand. Same closing method a lunging step.

Is maximum power generated just before weight is transferred to the forward foot?

If the front foot lands before the shot is landed, is significant power lost to the floor?

If the front foot is landed the arc of the power shot is longer. You penetrate deeper into your target, or at least make it harder for your target to distance your shot by moving away from it.

Which would be more effective dropping power into the target or through the target?

Now lets consider the other hand.

Same clip, same closing method.

Would a lead hand strike be stronger before or after the lead foot lands?


I'm really keyed up to go answer some questions on the bag but the medical folks have destroyed what's left of my shoulders poking and prodding the past two days. But I'm getting lots of good stuff to explore out of this thread. Can't wait to get healthy!

Laird
User avatar
Bill Glasheen
Posts: 17299
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am
Location: Richmond, VA --- Louisville, KY

Entering the low stance

Post by Bill Glasheen »

Laird

Take good care of those shoulders. I've had a few issues over the years myself, but fortunately have rehabed my way through. Don't take them for granted, particularly after they start giving you problems.

I'll take a stab at these very good questions.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>If one is delivering a power shot (like in this clip) and the blow is delivered with the rear hand. Same closing method a lunging step.

Is maximum power generated just before weight is transferred to the forward foot?

If the front foot lands before the shot is landed, is significant power lost to the floor?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Based on my thinking through this quite a bit (and playing with it last night), I have to say that "it depends."

Yes, I believe there is a power peak just before that front foot lands.

I also believe that one can get another even larger power peak - IF YOU DO IT RIGHT - by doing that plant and pivot thing I talked about. My only issue is that it takes a little bit of time to go from the first phase peak to the second phase peak. It's like when you are running, and you go from power stroke to power stroke as you step your feet forward.

So you can plant and pivot on the front foot and get an extra zing, or you can choose to connect during the peak of the earlier power stroke for the sake of speed and not "leading with your nose." <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote
Which would be more effective dropping power into the target or through the target?
Once again my stab at this would be "It depends." To send a shock wave to someone's thorax, I'd say into. To take someone's head off (so to write), I'd say through. Understand too that this depends somewhat on the kind of technique you are using. Techniques like the classic focused linear punch (as opposed to a looping haymaker) is designed to deliver at a point into the target (it has a somewhat narrow power range) whereas spinning hook kicks are really meant to be delivered through a target. Also, a linear palm heel thrust can be done through a jaw, with a kind of feeling that you're sending the person to the moon. I love doing that one on the bag; it makes it fly, and the chains make an angry snap sound when you do that. Image <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Now lets consider the other hand.

Same clip, same closing method.

Would a lead hand strike be stronger before or after the lead foot lands?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Here I am very opinionated - DEFINITELY before. You can't get the same rotation on the lead hand after you plant. Furthermore, you can plant and pivot after landing this very quick release lead punch, and end up hitting with the second punch (with more power) at about the same time most people are getting their first one off. It's a great sparring combination when done this way, and difficult to counterattack.

- Bill
User avatar
gmattson
Site Admin
Posts: 6073
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 1998 6:01 am
Location: Lake Mary, Florida
Contact:

Entering the low stance

Post by gmattson »

Its all a matter of forward momentum. When you land that front foot, regardless of which hand is doing the attack, your forward momentum either stops (in which case you are hitting with your upper body only) or with a soft landing, where the body continues fluid forward movement and maximum power is continued transmitted to the fist.

Looking at that car slamming into a wall example. The occupants (upper body of the attacker) continue forward, but the car (lower body) isn't adding to the forward motion.

------------------
GEM
candan
Posts: 235
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 6:01 am
Location: Canada

Entering the low stance

Post by candan »

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Looking at that car slamming into a wall example. The occupants (upper body of the
attacker) continue forward, but the car (lower body) isn't adding to the forward motion.

------------------
GEM
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Explained much better than my attempt, thank you. I debated this tonight after class with two of my peers who insist that a strike should be delivered after settling into "horse stance". This total stop then go doesn`t take advantage of the motion you expended so much of your energy to generate.
A rekin or elbow strike ..any strike actually after all the fluid motion is gone is simply not as effective. I disagree with "stomping" just for the sake of creating noise but if it occurs when generating fluid motion , Tobikomi, "vibration", ect. (which I intend to try to understand) then thats probably ideal. "Firing blanks" in my opinion is not effective. How can I tell the difference between an effective stomp or non- effective stomp? Not completely sure as I do not fully understand the concept, but the timing being off is a sure indicator and somehow just the overall appearance of the movement as a whole...it`s a learning curve and to be proven wrong or convinced otherwise can only be of benifit Image

[This message has been edited by candan (edited March 13, 2002).]
User avatar
Van Canna
Posts: 57244
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am

Entering the low stance

Post by Van Canna »

Fun thread.

The following from a boxing coach who trains boxers for real fighting in the ring instead of “playing at fighting” like us. Image

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> When punching,power moves from the center of the body, the major muscles, to the extremities, ending in the hand or foot.

This power moves from one part of the body to the next at a speed of 1/100 of a second. The whole movement from beginning to end takes only .15 to .18 of a second if the momentum possible in this action is correctly exploited.

Timing

Timing is more important than speed or momentum.

The timing at which a punch is delivered is crucial. If the punch is delivered too early it is without adequate balance. If it is delivered too late it has no power. Take the cross for example. The technique is simple enough, Step And Punch.

However, if you start the punch the same time you start the step, the fist will finish before the foot. (The hands move much more quickly than the feet).

Consequently, if your foot has not yet touched the floor when your punch lands, you will be punching on one leg. Try to stand on one leg for a while. Difficult isn't it? But this is how we sometimes punch, standing on one leg!

So instead, wait until the leg has landed. Leave it there until it feels comfortable, Until you are in a solid stance. Now punch. What happens? The punch is delivered purely by the strength in the arms. The punch has no body weight in it and would not be effective at all.

In order to be a truly effective, efficient technique, the hands must finish at the precise moment the foot lands.

This is the only way that the technique will encompass both body weight and balance.

All too often inexperienced fighters try to perform the cross as fast as possible. This results in the fist finishing far before the foot.

While the fighter feels happy because the punch has been delivered very, very quickly, the effect is minimal.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>


<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR> Breathing is important in boxing. Learning to control your breathing during a fight is crucial.

Many beginner boxers hold their breath during a fight. They get nervous and forget to breathe. This effects the body in many ways.

Muscles need oxygen to function. The less air you give your muscles the harder they have to work. Thus the less you breathe the quicker you get tired.

Also, it is extremely painful to get hit in the gut or in the ribs while holding your breath.

The only time I went down on the canvas is when I got caught holding my breath and someone nailed me in the ribs. I would rather get knocked out by being hit in the head than being put on the canvas that way.

When someone hits you in the gut or ribcage, exhale and let that pressure in your lungs escape.

A way to control your breathing is by getting into the habit of exhaling when you throw a punch. Sometimes when you watch boxing and you hear that hissing noise when a boxer throws a punch – that’s not air escaping from his gloves.

That’s him exhaling when he throws a punch. This method can also intimidate your opponent. The sound of the hissing reminds him that he is being hit and you have control of the fight for that moment.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>


Sorry, could not resist. Image


------------------
Van Canna
User avatar
Van Canna
Posts: 57244
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am

Entering the low stance

Post by Van Canna »

Then we have this guy: <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Falling Step Power. True he picked this one up from Jack Dempsey's book, but he was also quite familiar with its principle from his gung fu training.

It has to do with landing your punch or trapping a hand in timing with your lead step and weight transfer.

Actually, there is an exercise that develops this power. It's one of those tricky things that looks like a feat of strength, but also provides a clearer understanding of how to optimize the falling step effect. (See: "Falling Step Drill"). I still wear his palm print on my chest! ;-)<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Drill #1 Falling Step

Standing in front of your partner fully extend your right arm at chest level with fingers pointed upward, palm facing his chest.

Now stand on your left leg, hooking your right leg behind the knee. You are not punching, as this is only an exercise to better understand an important principle. Fall forward until your palm strikes his chest.

Be sure to keep the arm straight. At the same instant that your palm lands, your foot hits the ground.

It is this timing of hand and foot striking simultaneously that maximizes weight transfer at the critical moment. If done correctly, your partner will be hurled backward, if not knocked flat on his back.

Be careful with this and have him wear a protective pad. Important points to remember are don't hit, just fall forward keeping arm straight.

Most important, don't bend the knee when your foot impacts the ground, as this will absorb shock. Be sure you are standing far enough away so that your impact takes place at the point of maximum acceleration.

Think of a big oak tree falling. The closer it comes to the ground the more the acceleration and the greater the impact.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Any idea who this guy is [ that wrote this]? Image


------------------
Van Canna

[This message has been edited by Van Canna (edited March 14, 2002).]
User avatar
Bill Glasheen
Posts: 17299
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am
Location: Richmond, VA --- Louisville, KY

Entering the low stance

Post by Bill Glasheen »

Van

I think we are converging here for a number of different reasons.

You say <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>And to the sweeping, here are my views:

I came to Uechi Ryu from Judo. I was taught to sweep my opponent on the way in to me when his weight was not settled down and I could use his momentum against him.

I was told not to attempt a sweep once the forward foot landed as his weight settled, or I would be sweeping my dreams mostly, besides spraining my ankle and knee when using the inside of the foot for a sweep.

Sure enough, in my randori matches, and later, in my karate sparring matches, the opponents caught on the way in would tumble like duckpins. This is the same technique Bob Campbell uses to a great advantage.

Once a strong opponent, well versed in Tobikomi, lands his weight, you will have a difficult time sweeping him. It is easy to find this out on the Dojo floor.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> and I said <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote
The art of sweeping isn't executing as they land, it's executing the technique a fraction of a second before they stick it.
It appears we are in 100% agreement. As you said, it's easy enough to find this out on the dojo floor. I started working more with this after numerous exposures to this (Bob Campbell, a local judo guy, Ron Fagen). Like you, I came to the same conclusions. We now have this as a semi-regular exercise in our class.

From a practical standpoint, I learned that one does need to anticipate the attack to pull it off, or at least have the sweep so well conditioned that it happens without thought (like a simple parry). Bobby certainly had that down, and Bobby was one of those guys who seemed to know what you were going to do before you did it. Something about those "stealing eyes"... Image

Now that we are in agreement there, the point I would make here is that: 1) it (front foot planting) does present vulnerability (although there will always be something), and 2) one can train to attack with a quick delivery to negate this whole vulnerability thing. This sort of thing takes a long time to show, even in a classroom. I won't attempt to expound upon it here. The elder Shinjo taught this to Marty for sparring, and I've seen others either consciously or subconsciously do this. I've seen Gary attack this way when he spars, and I even commented to him about it. He just looked at me and nodded, like it was either obvious to him or he never really thought about it.

Now, on to other issues...

Last night I tried a few things in the dojo and slept on some of these issues. I played with the whole front foot thing. I take back some of what I said about the front foot not being productive in the attack delivery, but as I reasoned through what was going on, I realized that others haven't really quite defined it properly either.

I keep my premise that one can choose to "focus" (ippon) at ANY point in the whole process of driving forward with the legs. That's a good thing for a number of reasons. It creates choices. It allows one to emphasize one advantage of an attack over another, given the need. It allows someone to immediately adjust to changing distances and still pull off the focused ippon where all muscles contract at once and all motion seems to freeze for an infinitesimal moment.

Now as to what's going on with the back foot, front foot thing, I came up with a Newtonian physic explanation and some analogies. I realized I had stated it before, but didn't really give the second leg due emphasis. Basically if one chooses to have this back foot, front foot thing, we can break the physics down into three major phases:

Phase I: Attacker loads and then explodes off the rear leg. This generates translational momentum.

Phase II: Attacker plants (loads) front leg and creates a solid pivot rod from foot to shoulder. I really don't like the idea of a stomp, but I see the point. It's VITAL to have a very stiff rod on the end opposite from the attacking hand. This means we must turn the extending front leg and that whole side of the body from something like a chain to something like a car axle in a fraction of a second - hence the notion of a "stomp." Then one rotates around that pivot rod anchored by the front foot. This is converting the translational momentum generated in phase I to angular momentum. Similar things happen when a baseball pitcher throws a ball (a driving leg and a pivot leg) and when the batter hits the ball (a driving back leg and a pivot point on the front after planting foot). Actually there's a little bit of a subtlety going on with the fellow in the mpeg file. He starts with a very long lever when he plants the foot because of his extraordinarily long lunge. He then narrows the length of that lever as he continues to come forward. Conservation of angular momentum dictates that the fist will speed up as he does that, just like the ice skater spins faster when pulling in towards the center.

It should also be noted that in phase II, one is doing more than just converting translational momentum to angular momentum. Using a good twist of the body, one can add to the energy in the same way a batter does that when pivoting on his front leg. By doing a bit of a stomp on the pivot, one can create a bit of a plyometric response through the body that adds to that. I've seen batters and pitchers both do rotational plyometric work with a medicine ball to train/enhance that effect.

Phase III This is where one touches target (or imagines doing so in a kata) and must change from no load to high load. Everything in the body must stiffen at that point; it becomes like an isometric contraction. That further triggers the neuromuscular reflexes in the body, and gets the electric juices flowing (literally) that add more contraction to the motion. By definition when one is hitting an object that isn't going to move much, all motion does seem to cease. However more energy is being generated and transferred to the target. The isometric (same position) contraction - when done properly against a heavy target - can be quite violent. The only way to really get this down right is to hit things. It's the "time on contact" thing that Jimmy Malone likes to talk about when doing his pressure point seminars.

OK, that being said, here is my comment on this specific mpeg.

1) The fellow pretty much hits the jaw before he gets much done in phase two. It looks like he would have put more into it, but the dummy he was fighting sort of walked into the punch. This is precisely what I mean when I say one should be able to do that focus (phase III) at any point. Sometimes you intentionally shorten the early power generation phases (eliminate the plant before punching) to take the sweep or counterpunch away from your opponent. And sometimes distances change and you take what you can get. I believe the latter happened with this guy.

2) The whole concept of the Okinawan focused punch is somewhat irrelevant in this particular instance. As I understand history, the focused punch was most practically applied to the body, where you needed to hit very hard to exact the kind of damage that you desired. Furthermore, its need was necessitated by the fact that some of their opponents wore bamboo armor, so one needed to send a power shockwave through that and into the body. Going at the jaw is really a whole other thing. To start with, one really doesn't need that isometric contraction phase as the jaw and head are going to snap back (a good thing). Instead one wants a kind of follow-through motion best done with techniques like your classic haymaker seen on the street. This also explains why something like a spinning hook kick - applied with motion through the target - is so deadly to the head. It's like a batter swinging through a ball, rather than a batter hitting someone's ribs on the street. Furthermore, the smart Okinawan wouldn't be punching the face, right?? Image 'Nuff said.

I hope you appreciate what I am going through here, Van, and I hope you understand how much I appreciate the patient approach you have taken to all this. I am getting a lot out of this. Thanks.

- Bill
Guest

Entering the low stance

Post by Guest »

In order to be a truly effective, efficient technique, the hands must finish at the precise moment the foot lands.
_____________________________________________

Well stated! I believe this is the way to deliver power.

Laird
Guest

Entering the low stance

Post by Guest »

Think about a boxers jab or similar motion.

Some jabs are very fast but have nothing behind them. An anoyance if you will.

Other jabs can straighten a fighter stop them in their tracks.

The diffence is one is an arm punch. Thrown after the front foot has stoped moving.(stationary jab)

The other jab is not. Take a look at Larry Holmes on tape. Larry threw a stiff jab. He delivered it with a sliding step. It landed just as his feet did. His oponent was hit with all of his momentum, The forward motion of his body mass, the power of the leg muscles all added to the shot. This is the jab that can drop an oponent, this is a jab that pops the chin up ready for the cross.

This is great fundamental power dynamics!

This is also the same foot work(sliding step)that can put great power in the wakue when used as a distance closing block.The sliding step puts power in the block.

End of rant.

Laird
User avatar
Van Canna
Posts: 57244
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 1999 6:01 am

Entering the low stance

Post by Van Canna »

Well said Laird.

Notice that in my post there is reference to Jack Dempsey's book about the "concept"!

But what did he know, right?

A good example of the "Peter Pan" syndrome? Image



------------------
Van Canna
Post Reply

Return to “Bill Glasheen's Dojo Roundtable”