Some scream that it is all about oil and America never had the intent to help anyone there, just being a greedy superpower and flexing our muscle, we wish to take what we want.
I promptly shot this down in another thread by saying that if we wanted the oil, we could have went to the U.N. and had the sanctions lifted and we would have had it dirt cheap instead of paying anywhere from 75 to 100 billion to go to war. But this falls on the deaf ears of so many who wish to create fantasy upon fantasy of America as some sort of big bully.
I believe that Saddam Hussein's Regime, hopefully now deceased, was a threat to the United States. No straw man arguments of him launching missiles here, no, it would not have happened like that. He would have been a weapons-supplier to anyone who wanted to attack us. He is a sponsor of terrorism and as such, he painted a bull's-eye on himself.
But let us assume for just a moment that this really was about oil. Let's assume that George W. Bush and his Cabinet are the madmen many claim they are. Consider this.
If that is the case, isn't the end of this Regime a wonderful thing?
There is the perception that American Media is a right wing propaganda machine, they're fifty-percent correct. It is a propaganda machine, but it's not right wing. When NBC's Katie Couric remarks (yesterday) that she hopes Saddam Hussein made it to Syria, ain't that some sh*t?
CNN has long been the best friend of The American Left. I chuckle when people here say that the media is right wing. Absolutely clueless.
Here is a little bit of what Al-Jazeera won't tell you about and it comes from a most interesting source. CNN. Not Fox News, it's CNN. It also raises some questions as to the influence and sway that Saddam Hussein might have held over ALL news agencies operating out of Iraq. If for no other reason, they wanted to keep their people alive and could not report the truth.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/11/opini ... ner=GOOGLEThe News We Kept to Ourselves
By EASON JORDAN
ATLANTA — Over the last dozen years I made 13 trips to Baghdad to lobby the government to keep CNN's Baghdad bureau open and to arrange interviews with Iraqi leaders. Each time I visited, I became more distressed by what I saw and heard — awful things that could not be reported because doing so would have jeopardized the lives of Iraqis, particularly those on our Baghdad staff.
For example, in the mid-1990's one of our Iraqi cameramen was abducted. For weeks he was beaten and subjected to electroshock torture in the basement of a secret police headquarters because he refused to confirm the government's ludicrous suspicion that I was the Central Intelligence Agency's Iraq station chief. CNN had been in Baghdad long enough to know that telling the world about the torture of one of its employees would almost certainly have gotten him killed and put his family and co-workers at grave risk.
Working for a foreign news organization provided Iraqi citizens no protection. The secret police terrorized Iraqis working for international press services who were courageous enough to try to provide accurate reporting. Some vanished, never to be heard from again. Others disappeared and then surfaced later with whispered tales of being hauled off and tortured in unimaginable ways. Obviously, other news organizations were in the same bind we were when it came to reporting on their own workers.
We also had to worry that our reporting might endanger Iraqis not on our payroll. I knew that CNN could not report that Saddam Hussein's eldest son, Uday, told me in 1995 that he intended to assassinate two of his brothers-in-law who had defected and also the man giving them asylum, King Hussein of Jordan. If we had gone with the story, I was sure he would have responded by killing the Iraqi translator who was the only other participant in the meeting. After all, secret police thugs brutalized even senior officials of the Information Ministry, just to keep them in line (one such official has long been missing all his fingernails).
Still, I felt I had a moral obligation to warn Jordan's monarch, and I did so the next day. King Hussein dismissed the threat as a madman's rant. A few months later Uday lured the brothers-in-law back to Baghdad; they were soon killed.
I came to know several Iraqi officials well enough that they confided in me that Saddam Hussein was a maniac who had to be removed. One Foreign Ministry officer told me of a colleague who, finding out his brother had been executed by the regime, was forced, as a test of loyalty, to write a letter of congratulations on the act to Saddam Hussein. An aide to Uday once told me why he had no front teeth: henchmen had ripped them out with pliers and told him never to wear dentures, so he would always remember the price to be paid for upsetting his boss. Again, we could not broadcast anything these men said to us.
Last December, when I told Information Minister Muhammad Said al-Sahhaf that we intended to send reporters to Kurdish-controlled northern Iraq, he warned me they would "suffer the severest possible consequences." CNN went ahead, and in March, Kurdish officials presented us with evidence that they had thwarted an armed attack on our quarters in Erbil. This included videotaped confessions of two men identifying themselves as Iraqi intelligence agents who said their bosses in Baghdad told them the hotel actually housed C.I.A. and Israeli agents. The Kurds offered to let us interview the suspects on camera, but we refused, for fear of endangering our staff in Baghdad.
Then there were the events that were not unreported but that nonetheless still haunt me. A 31-year-old Kuwaiti woman, Asrar Qabandi, was captured by Iraqi secret police occupying her country in 1990 for "crimes," one of which included speaking with CNN on the phone. They beat her daily for two months, forcing her father to watch. In January 1991, on the eve of the American-led offensive, they smashed her skull and tore her body apart limb by limb. A plastic bag containing her body parts was left on the doorstep of her family's home.
I felt awful having these stories bottled up inside me. Now that Saddam Hussein's regime is gone, I suspect we will hear many, many more gut-wrenching tales from Iraqis about the decades of torment. At last, these stories can be told freely.
Eason Jordan is chief news executive at CNN.
Now, is this man a "right wing mouthpiece" or a "right wing nut" as well? From CNN of all places? CNN is not exactly Pro-Republican for those that don't know, in fact they were nicknamed "CNN, The Clinton News Network" for most of the 90s.
This is why I condemn those who support this Regime without coming out and saying they support it. For if you are against the conflict, you are, in a very real way, supporting the continuation of this sort of evil being inflicted on those people.
Consider this as well as you digest the story above.
"Pacifism is objectively pro-Fascist. This is elementary common sense. If you hamper the war effort of one side you automatically help that of the other. Nor is there any real way of remaining outside such a war as the present one. In practice, 'he that is not with me is against me.' The idea that you can somehow remain aloof from and superior to the struggle, while living on food that British sailors risk their lives to bring you, is a bourgeois illusion bred of money and security."
Orwell's "Pacifism and the War" of July 12, 1942:
Interesting, as I was reading that story from the CNN employee, I was reminded of George Orwell's classic, "1984."
It's almost as if Hussein patterned some of his modern day Gestapo after the Thought Police in "1984" along with his very own Ministry of Love.